Theories on the soul

By admin · Monday, August 3rd, 2009

Soul: The core energy source that enables the organs to function; i.e. : Heart, lungs, brain, etc.

Is this not the correct assessment of the soul. It is a grand idea, inside of a very simple package. The soul; whether fully capable of solitary thought separate from the brain, or just a mass of energy- is the source of energy that is responsible for living organisms to sustain life, thought, and everyday functions.

This; I can understand, may cause scientific and medical debate whether or not a single cell organism has a soul, or a fetus in the womb, an egg in an ovary, sperm in the scrotum, animals, etc.

The soul is neither positive or negative. It is an absorption of both. Arguably the soul absorbs energy from the point life has begun to grow from single cell, into multi-cell organism. Such as a child in the womb. Absorbing energy from metaphysical plains, spiritual, ethereal, and of course the birth mother. Presumably the soul also gathers energy from around the human incubator, better known as a pregnant female. (Apologies to any one that might have found offense to that impoliticly correct statement). The point being the soul absorbs energy from life outside the womb, as well as inside the womb. As the soul grows it begins to reflect certain types of energy. Of course the creation and recreation of DNA; resulting in personality traits, and other such DNA-”netics”.

So now the soul, burning in hell or forgiven of all sins. Make your choice; one hand you can choose one of the many paths to enlightenment. Whomever is destined for the negative pit of whichever religion, is purely up to the Godhead of each specific religion. Of course on the other hand there is only one single road to salvation; certainly another path. It all depends on what each persons soul has absorbed’ in “It’s” existence. (I say this because who actually knows how old a soul can actually be. Yes many of you have the answer no doubt, what ever God you believe in. So I accept it as correct). So if a soul has absorbed the belief of hell, or such a place, and a heaven of some kind then at least to that person those places exist and are very real. (I will not argue whether or not hell exists, but I will say my personal beliefs are that it does. Neither prov-en or disprov-en as far as I can see). If salvation is deemed necessary by the soul, then by all means must be obtained. To each their own in short. I choose to follow a God that offers this, I can not label myself Christlike, or Christian. I have my own path of ungodly behavior that I must attend to. But Jesus himself did not come to save the righteous- he came to save the sinners. I could dream of a life without sin; oddly enough the goal would be called heaven. The place without evil. So believe in the son of man; I do. Yet believe in the power of man; I do. My soul has absorbed much of both halves. So what does this page say about the soul? In my opinion was answered in the first line, the rest is just words.

Related Articles

Topics: Religion & Spirituality · Tags: , ,
 

Leave a Comment

« Atheism vs. religion | Home | The Enigma of Psychic Surgery in the Philippines Part 2 – Jun Labo »