Discussing the concept of moral truth

By admin · Friday, August 21st, 2009

Although I have written recently of distinctions at all points of the intercardinal axial compass between morality, amorality, unmorality and immorality, with morality and unmorality the standard distinctions compared to amoral and immoral departures from above or below, as the gender-specific case may be, I should emphasize that I was generalizing rather than allowing, more categorically, for further distinctions between the genuine forms of morality, amorality, unmorality, and immorality, and their pseudo’ counterparts. For, categorically speaking, such further distinctions indubitably exist, and they do so with regard to the absolute standings of morality and immorality vis-vis the relative standings of amorality and unmorality.

Now since the

intercardinal axial compass is divisible between noumenal and phenomenal positions, corresponding to ethereal and corporeal class distinctions, it should be logically feasible to contend that only in the noumenal positions, whether in terms of the metachemical/pseudo-metaphysic al northwest point of the said compass or, contrariwise, in terms of the metaphysical/pseudo-metachemic al

northeast point of it, will both morality and immorality be genuine, since such positions, being noumenal, are absolute, as, in their opposite ways, are morality and immorality, with a 3:1 ratio of soma to psyche (female) or of psyche to soma (male).

The amoral and unmoral positions, by contrast, will be pseudo’, since existing or transpiring within the absolute parameters of the noumenal.

Hence not only will pseudo-metaphysics and pseudo-metachemistry be symptomatic of pseudo’ manifestations of unmorality, but quasi-pseudo-metaphysical departures from metachemistry in the one case, and quasi-pseudo-metachemical departures from metaphysics in the other case will also be symptomatic of the pseudo’ modes of amorality.

All this, however, ceases to apply with the southwest and southeast points of the intercardinal

axial compass, wherein the phenomenal relativity (2:1) of chemistry over pseudo-physics and, across the axial divide, of physics over pseudo-chemistry will present the opposite case to anything noumenal namely, a fundamental distinction between the pseudo’ standings of morality and immorality vis-vis the genuine standings of amorality and unmorality, whether in terms of a 2:1 ratio of soma to psyche (female) or of psyche to soma (male).

Hence both chemistry and physics exemplify pseudo-morality within the paradoxical standings of

Related Articles

Topics: Arts & Humanities · Tags: , ,
 

Leave a Comment

« Author assessment: Ayn Rand | Home | The Metaphysical View of Death and Life After Death Part 8 »